Development of an in-house bone marrow collection kit: The Catalan bone marrow transplantation group experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bone marrow (BM) harvesting is one of the essential sources of stem cells for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In 2019, commercial BM collection kits became unavailable in Europe. Consequently, we created an in-house BM collection kit as an alternative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared two groups of BM collections. The first collections were taken using an in-house kit from June 2022 through February 2023 and the second with a commercial kit from February 2021 through May 2022. These all took place at seven collection centres (CC). We analysed the harvest quality (cell blood count, CD34+ cells, viability, potency and sterility), the incidents occurring with each kit and the time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in recipients. RESULTS: A total of 23 donors underwent BM harvesting with the in-house kit and 23 with the commercial one. Both cohorts were comparable regarding donor characteristics, CC and time to procedure. No statistical differences were found in harvest quality between the in-house and commercial kits. A new transfusion set was required in three BM harvests (13%) with the in-house kit because of filter clogging. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 21 days for both cohorts and 29 days (in-house) and 33 days (commercial), p = 0.284, respectively. CONCLUSION: The in-house BM collection kit offers a real approach to solve the diminished supply of commercial kits. A higher risk of filter clogging was observed compared with commercial kits due to the lack of 850 and 500 µm filters.

Virus-Specific T Cells From Cryopreserved Blood During an Emergent Virus Outbreak for a Potential Off-the-Shelf Therapy.

During the first outbreak of an emergent virus, methods need to be developed to rapidly establish suitable therapies for patients with high risk of severe disease caused by the pathogen. Considering the importance of the T-cell response in controlling viral infections, adoptive cell therapy with virus-specific T cells has been used as a safe and effective antiviral prophylaxis and treatment for immunocompromised patients. The main objective of this study was to establish an effective and safe method to cryostore whole blood as starting material and to adapt a T-cell activation and expansion protocol to generate an off-the-shelf antiviral therapeutic option. Additionally, we studied how memory T-cell phenotype, clonality based on T-cell receptor, and antigen specificity could condition characteristics of the final expanded T-cell product. Twenty-nine healthy blood donors were selected from a database of convalescent plasma donors with a confirmed history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Blood was processed using a fully automated, clinical-grade, and 2-step closed system. Eight cryopreserved bags were advanced to the second phase of the protocol to obtain purified mononucleated cells. We adapted the T-cell activation and expansion protocol, without specialized antigen-presenting cells or presenting molecular structures, in a G-Rex culture system with IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 cytokine stimulation. The adapted protocol successfully activated and expanded virus-specific T cells to generate a T-cell therapeutic product. We observed no major impact of post-symptom onset time of donation on the initial memory T-cell phenotype or clonotypes resulting in minor differences in the final expanded T-cell product. We showed that antigen competition in the expansion of T-cell clones affected the T-cell clonality based on the T-cell receptor ß repertoire. We demonstrated that good manufacturing practice of blood preprocessing and cryopreserving is a successful procedure to obtain an initial cell source able to activate and expand without a specialized antigen-presenting agent. Our 2-step blood processing allowed recruitment of the cell donors independently of the expansion cell protocol timing, facilitating donor, staff, and facility needs. Moreover, the resulting virus-specific T cells could be also banked for further use, notably maintaining viability and antigen specificity after cryopreservation.

A hub-and-spoke model to deliver effective access to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in a public health network: the Catalan Blood and Tissue Bank experience.

BACKGROUND AIMS: To describe and analyze whether a hub-and-spoke organizational model could efficiently provide access to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy within a network of academic hospitals and address the growing demands of this complex and specialized activity. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective evaluation of activity within the Catalan Blood and Tissue Bank network, which was established for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to serve six CAR T-cell programs in academic hospitals of the Catalan Health Service. Procedures at six hospitals were followed from 2016 to 2021. Collection shipments of starting materials, CAR T-cell returns for storage and infusions for either clinical trials or commercial use were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 348 leukocytapheresis procedures were performed, 39% of which were delivered fresh and 61% of which were cryopreserved. The network was linked to seven advanced therapy medicinal product manufacturers. After production, 313 CAR T-cell products were shipped back to the central cryogenic medicine warehouse located in the hub. Of the units received, 90% were eventually administered to patients. A total of 281 patients were treated during this period, 45% in clinical trials and the rest with commercially available CAR T-cell therapies. CONCLUSIONS: A hub-and-spoke organizational model based on an existing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program is efficient in incorporating CAR T-cell therapy into a public health hospital network. Rapid access and support of growing activity enabled 281 patients to receive CAR T cells during the study period.

Leukocytapheresis variables and transit time for allogeneic cryopreserved hpc: better safe than sorry.

Cryopreservation was recommended to ensure continuity in allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Several groups have shown no impact on clinical outcomes for patients who underwent HPC transplantation with cryopreserved products during the first months of this pandemic. However, concerns about quality control attributes after cryopreservation have been raised. We investigated, in 155 allogeneic peripheral blood cryopreserved HPC, leukocytapheresis characteristics influencing viable CD34+ and CD3+ cells, and CFU-GM recoveries after thawing. Collection characteristics such as volume, nucleated cells (NC)/mL and hematocrit correlated with viable CD34+ and CD3+ cells recoveries after thawing in univariate analysis but only CD3+ cells remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis (r2 = 0.376; P = < 0.001). Additionally, transit time also showed correlation with viable CD34+ (r2 = 0.186), CD3+ (r2 = 0.376) and CFU-GM recoveries (r2 = 0.212) in multivariate analysis. Thus, diluting leukocytapheresis below 200 × 106 NC/mL, avoiding red cells contamination above 2%, cryopreserving below 250 × 106 NC/mL and minimizing transit time below 36 h, prevented poor viable CD34+ and CD3+ cells, and CFU-GM recoveries. In summary, optimizing leukocytapheresis practices and minimizing transportation time may better preserve the quality attributes of HPC when cryopreservation is indicated.

Cryopreservation of unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cells: the right answer for transplantations during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Cryopreservation was recommended to ensure continuity of unrelated donor (UD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during COVID-19 pandemic. However, its impact on clinical outcomes and feasibility was not well known. We compared 32 patients who underwent UD HSCT using cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) during the COVID-19 pandemic with 32 patients who underwent UD HSCT using fresh PBSC in the previous period. Median neutrophil engraftment was 17.5 and 17.0 days with cryopreserved and fresh grafts, respectively. Non-significant delays were found in platelet recovery days (25.5 versus 19.0; P = 0.192) and full donor chimerism days (35.0 and 31.5; P = 0.872) using cryopreserved PBSC. The rate of acute graft-versus-host disease at 100 days was 41% (95% CI [21-55%]) in cryopreserved group versus 31% (95% CI [13-46%]) in fresh group (P = 0.380). One-hundred days progression-relapse free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly. During COVID-19 pandemic, six frozen UD donations were not transfused and logistical and clinical issues regarding cryopreservation procedure, packaging, and transporting appeared. In summary, UD HSCT with cryopreserved PBSC was safe during this challenging time. More efforts are needed to ensure that all frozen grafts are transplanted and cryopreservation requirements are harmonized.

Cord blood-derived platelet concentrates as starting material for new therapeutic blood components prepared in a public cord blood bank: from product development to clinical application.

BACKGROUND: There are many advantages to using cord blood (CB) as a source of therapeutic platelet and plasma derivatives for regenerative medicine. These include availability, universal use, young donor source, and virally safe biological material, rich in tissue regenerative factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We aimed to validate a bioprocess design for the production of cord blood-derived platelet concentrates (CBPC) in a public Cord Blood Bank (CBB). CBPC was defined as a product of 10±5 mL, 1,000±200×109/L total platelets, free of erythrocytes and leukocytes. A total of 300 CB units were centrifuged in two steps to enrich for platelets, in compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice. The samples were tested for the degree of platelet activation present, and the levels of growth factor were analysed to evaluate their potential function. CBPC were then activated after thawing with 10% calcium gluconate to generate platelet gels (CBPG) to treat patients with diabetic foot ulcers. RESULTS: After processing, 84% of the products fulfilled the acceptance criteria. Final products contained 1,017±149×106 platelets/mL in 10±3mL of plasma. Platelet recovery was 50±9%. The methods described here ensure depletion of white and red blood cells down to a residual concentration of 0.2±0.1×106/mL and 0.03±0.02×106/mL, respectively. Platelets showed low levels of activation during processing, but were significantly activated after thawing, as indicated by an increase in CD62p expression. The growth factors EGF, VEGF, bFGF, PDGF AB/BB and TGF-ß1 were at concentrations of 1,706±123 pg/mL; 1,602±227 pg/mL; 314±26 pg/mL; 30±1.5 ng/mL; 24±2 ng/mL (mean±standard error of mean), respectively. For clinical evaluation, a total of 21 CBPG were applied in 3 patients, with no reported adverse events and improvement of ulcers in all of them. DISCUSSION: We designed and validated a highly reproducible, closed system method to manufacture high quality CBPC suitable for clinical applications using CB units not suitable for transplantation in a public CBB.

Thawing of cryopreserved hematopoietic progenitor cells from apheresis with a new dry-warming device.

BACKGROUND: Current thawing techniques of cryopreserved progenitor cells are based on the use of a water bath. The aim of this study has been to assess the progenitor cell viability and the time of hematopoietic engraftment after transplantation of cell products thawed with a new dry-thawing device. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In the preclinical phase, two cryobags from the same patient were thawed with the standard technique and with the dry system method in parallel (n=5, Protocol A and Protocol B, respectively). In the clinical phase, cryobags were thawed with the dry system and the time to hematopoietic engraftment after autologous transplantation (n=52) was compared with those of a control group of patients whose progenitor cell products were thawed with the standard technique (n=52). RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in nuclear and CD34+ cell viability, total colony-forming cells, and cloning efficiency after thawing with Protocols A and B. Days to neutrophil (>0.5×10(9) and >1×10(9) /L) and platelet engraftment (>20×10(9) and >50×10(9) /L) were not different between patients transplanted with products thawed with Protocols A and B. CONCLUSION: Progenitor cell viability and function are preserved with this dry-thawing system. The time to hematopoietic engraftment of patients after transplantation is comparable to those infused with progenitor cells thawed with the water bath technique. Thawing cell products without the use of water and in a dry environment might favor the use of this dry method.